© Eric Richmond |
On May 13th 2020, I
talked to violinist Kati Debretzeni at her home in Hertfordshire,
England.
PH: Looking at your
professional life, very much of your work consists of leading ensembles and
orchestras. Have you always been a leader?
KD: Actually, that is
a very interesting question. Well, I haven’t always been a leader. I learned my
craft seated at the back of violin sections: I think that is the best way to
learn it. You learn from your superiors and from the people who were there
before you and who have more experience. You slowly work your way up and then,
by the time you are put in a leading position, you have absorbed all the things
other people have taught you.
It all started with
my meeting with Baroque music. The first orchestral position I had was in the
Jerusalem Baroque Orchestra when I was a student at the Tel Aviv Academy of
Music. It was a bit by chance, because a violinist friend of mine couldn’t go
to rehearsal and asked me to stand in for him. And David Shemer (JBO founder
and director) got me hooked! I became a member of the violin section. Then,
after a couple of years, David asked me to lead the Jerusalem Baroque
Orchestra. So, apart from a youth orchestra, that was the first time I was
leading an orchestra. What led up to this was also the experience of playing
chamber music with David, Idit Shemer, Myrna Herzog and singer Miriam Melzer - We were the
“Jerusalem Consort” - and I learned a lot from them. That stood me in very good
stead for my career in England.
In England, I started
again. I was in the back row of the first violins of the English Concert
(Trevor Pinnock); they had a very strong house style that Trevor had honed over
three decades. That experience for me was a fantastic way of learning the basic
repertoire - Bach suites, the Handel
oratorios, Handel’s concerti grossi, Corelli, etc. - the real Baroque
orchestral repertoire. Then, in 2000, John Eliot Gardiner set out to record all
the Bach cantatas in “The Bach Cantata Pilgrimage” series. By then, I was also
at the back of the first violin section of the English Baroque Soloists. (Like
all Baroque players here, we are all part of a number of ensembles.) When I
auditioned for Gardiner in 1996, he said: “Four years from now, I will do all
the Bach cantatas and I will need more than one leader. I would like you to
then come and audition for that role. In the meantime, you can play in the
orchestra”. So, over four years I learned from Alison Bury, who was a fantastic
leader; she was unbelievably clear in her gestures and very good at
transmitting what the conductor wanted. That’s what the leader does. Aiming to
perform all the Bach cantatas, Gardiner’s idea was that he himself would be the
only person involved in all the performances. Considering it would be humanly
impossible for the musicians to play or sing for 365 days a year, the decision
was to have three orchestras and three choirs rotating, each working for a
period of three to four weeks. I was very lucky because, just at that time, I
got to lead one of the orchestras, but I was also still part of Alison Bury’s
orchestra, the original orchestra of the English Baroque Soloists, and I got to
sit next to her for that year and also for a couple of years after that.
Becoming her No.2 was a school for life, because Alison’s instincts are
infallible. If you sit next to a really good leader you learn so much!
After that came leading the Orchestra of the
Age of Enlightenment. Catherine Mackintosh
had retired from the job and Elizabeth Wallfisch was also retiring from the
orchestra at that point, so two positions for leaders had come up. (In the
Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment, four leaders share the job.) My
colleague Matthew Truscott and I were appointed to be
leaders. Also there, I had been playing in the orchestra for ten years before
leading, had observed Catherine Mackintosh,
Elizabeth Wallfisch, Margaret Faultless and Alison Bury (also leading
there) - four very different people with four very different leading
styles. You could see what worked and what didn’t work and how the leaders
liaised with different conductors, because, as opposed to the English Baroque
Soloists (one person’s orchestra and choir whose strong house style is familiar
to us), the OAE is self-governed and we invite conductors with whom we would
like to collaborate. I had ten years to observe how my superiors coped with a
different conductor every day, with different personalities, with different
conducting styles and with the different responses needed.
PH:
So, how would you summarize the role of orchestra leader?
KD: As a leader, you
are the conduit
between what the conductor in front of you is indicating and what the orchestra
should be doing as a whole. Sometimes you have some autonomy; for example, if the
conductor gives less-than-clear gestures (the orchestra still has to be
together). Then it is your
responsibility to give a gesture and decide when the orchestra plays. If you think something is not clear to the whole
orchestra, your job is to ask the conductor to clarify what he wants. Sometimes
the leader has to decide on the issue of “how” to play - what kind of gesture
is indicated and, through your body gestures, you transmit or translate
that to the rest of the section and, hopefully, to the rest of the orchestra.
You also have to be able to liaise with the other principals in the orchestra,
especially the principal bass and principal ‘cello. Sometimes, if it is a big
orchestra, it is very good to liaise with the timpanist, because he is the pulse giver. So, there is what we call this little triangle -
the leader, principal ‘cellist with principal bass and timpani. If those three
elements are together, the orchestra will be together. And then there is the
wind section, with which you also sometimes need visual- or some kind of
contact to know exactly when to play together. So, there is a whole web of
things going on (not always clear to an audience enjoying how wonderful the
music sounds) being together as a wonderfully honed organism. And this organism
is made up of all different organs - the heart, liver, the kidneys...We all
have to work together for the whole to function. The conductor shapes it all
and if you have a fantastic conductor, as we have several with which we
regularly collaborate, the outcome is wonderful. But,
if the leader is weak, the orchestra will not sound at its best. And to be the
leader without all the experience of being a member of the orchestra would be
most daunting. There are people who are natural leaders and those not suited to
being leaders. I did not set out to be a leader but grew into the role.
PH: When did you
start playing the violin?
KD: At six and a
half, back in Romania (Transylvania) at a specialist music school. But my
parents were musicians and, on my father’s side, the grandparents were
musicians as well, as were my great-grandparents. There was not much else you
could do in my family!
PH: When was your
first meeting with period instruments?
KD: In the Israeli
army, I served in the Outstanding Musicians Unit as a member of the Air Force
String Quartet (we were actually only three players!!) Another member was
violinist Moshe Haas (now a tenor in the chorus of the Israeli Opera). He had
just returned from studies with Arnold Steinhardt (1st violinist of the
Guarneri Quartet) at the Curtis Institute, Philadelphia, and was back in Israel to do his mandatory
army service. He had brought back the germ of having been “indoctrinated” by a
harmony teacher who was very much into period instrument performance practice
and who had provided him with all kinds of clandestine tapes of CDs to listen
to - of Sigiswald Kuijken, Anner Bylsma and Sergiu Luca, etc. Moshe’s plan on
finishing his army service was to go to Basel to study early music there at the
Schola Cantorum. As we played together, Moshe kept passing on to me all these
weird and wonderful tapes and CDs (CDs were quite new then) and I thought the
recordings were absolutely wonderful, although I had no inclination to try
these styles of playing. But they somehow made sense. I so loved Anner Bylsma’s
recording of the Bach ‘Cello Suites - the music kept dancing! When we, as
modern violinists were taught solo Bach, the playing was a little more
ponderous and plodding. What Bylsma was doing on his Baroque ‘cello and with
his “strange” Baroque bow just sounded more natural. But again, this was
something that was in the air at the time, I thought how wonderful and
absolutely brilliant it was, but I needed to get on with my own studies. My
violin teacher, Ora Shiran (leader of the Israel Chamber Orchestra for many
years) was very tolerant and open-minded. She was a Juilliard graduate and knew
very little about Baroque violin or historic instruments, yet she kept
encouraging me to find a persuasive way of playing with whatever instrument or
bow I would be using.
PH:
So, how did you make your way into the world of Baroque performance?
KD:
Having listened to all the Baroque-style recordings Moshe had given me, I then
met harpsichordist Jochewed Schwarz at the Academy of Music. She had recently
returned from studies in Basel and was offering an introductory course on early
performance practice. I took that course because it chimed in with the tapes I
had heard. Jochewed was a wonderful teacher; the course was interesting and
intriguing. It included our having a go at playing some repertoire I had never
heard of - some Biber and some Muffat - beautiful music which sounded
wonderful. With interesting concepts to think about, the course was also
intellectually stimulating. This was all very good to know about, but
“something for other people in which to get their feet wet”. And then, as I
mentioned earlier, I got to play in David Shemer’s Baroque Orchestra...only
because my (non-Baroque) violinist friend couldn’t make it to rehearsal. I had
gone there with my modern violin and my modern bow, was asked to tune down half
a tone (already a bit weird) and it was at the rehearsal break that I first met
viol player and Baroque ‘cellist
Myrna Herzog. She approached me and said: “You
know, you should really get rid of your shoulder-rest and chin-rest. And I’ll
bring you some books to read about this period, because you should know what
Mozart’s father wrote about the Baroque violin. And, if you would like, come to
play some trio sonatas with my husband and me. Maybe we can lend you a Baroque
violin and bow.” Well, having only heard recordings and never having seen such
instruments, I thought she was completely crazy. I had no idea what she was
talking about. But I went to play trio sonatas with Myrna and her
husband Eliahu at their home and they lent me a Baroque violin and Baroque bow. That time was the beginning of wonderful friendships
both with David and Myrna and of my involvement with Baroque music. Then I took
the opportunity of participating in the mythical Early Music Workshop, the
wonderful, wonderful courses organized annually in Jerusalem by Hed Sella. What
a shame they no longer exist. This course produced a lot of Israeli Baroque
musicians. After attending the workshop, I went back to my modern violin
teacher and told her I wanted to play my Bach a little differently. She was
open-minded enough to say: “If you are musically convincing, I don’t care what
you play it on and how you play it; I just want to be musically convinced and
it will be fine.” Then it was time to do proper study of Baroque performance
and I ended up in London at the Royal College of Music studying with Catherine Mackintosh
and with Walter Reiter, the latter had been a teacher at the workshops....from
then on, it was my professional life, being a member of the English Concert,
the English Baroque Soloists, the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment and I
also did a good stint as principal 2nd in the Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra (Ton
Koopman), recording all the Bach cantatas, Koopman’s project taking several
years to complete. That was also a wonderful experience.
PH:
Where do you stand regarding the authentic performance movement?
KD:
“Authentic” is a very contentious word. “Authentic” is what you feel is true.
“Historically informed” is a better term. I’m not a fanatic...I’m pragmatic. I
think that if you don’t have absolutely the right equipment for every 50 years
of music (and one should), and you only have two or three instruments for the
300 years we are trying to encompass, you may not achieve the right timbres for
each period. So, in an ideal world, the right equipment gives that extra layer
of sound. But, even more important than the right equipment is what you know
about the music itself, about how they played it, where they did or didn’t accent
a bar or a phrase, how they “spoke” the music with the bow, what the
stylistic components of the music were, how and where they ornamented, etc. For
me, “how” you play the music is more important than the instrument on which you
play it. For example, pure gut G strings (they are like rope!) were used
in 17th century Italian music - uncovered gut strings - and they sound
like nothing on earth. I, personally, don’t like playing on them, because they
don’t give the kind of sound I want to be making. But I can see that, when people
do play on them, that is the sound that was produced way back then. Whether you
like it or not is a different thing.
PH:
How are modern-trained musicians relating to early music performance practice
today?
KD: I see the best modern musicians relating
seriously to Baroque music. Isabelle Faust, for example, is a modern soloist
who has shown much interest in the historically informed movement. When she
plays Bach, it sounds as if she is playing it on a Baroque violin; she is, in
fact, playing it on her Stradivarius (i.e. a modern violin) strung with
gut strings (three uncovered, one covered) and using a Baroque bow. I am not
worried by the fact that she is not playing a bona fide Baroque instrument,
because it sounds as if she were. When she plays Bach, she sounds like a
Baroque violinist and when she plays Mozart, she sounds like a Classical
violinist: for the latter, she uses a wonderful, original very early Tourte bow
- an open frog, Classical swan-head bow. But she is indeed a modern violinist:
she strings up her Strad with steel strings and plays concertos of Alban Berg
or Bartok with just as much success all over the world. The same goes for
Leonidis Kavakos, a world class touring soloist, who studied Bach performance
with Nikolaus Harnoncourt at the Mozarteum University, Salzburg; actually, a
few steps down the corridor, he was also studying modern violin with the great
Hungarian teacher Sándor Végh, who forbade his students to go to Harnoncourt’s
classes even though the two teachers were basically talking about the exact
same things! Kavakos went through all the Bach solo sonatas and partitas with
Harnoncourt. So, there are some very high-ranking soloists who are interested
in the historically informed movement because it talks to them much more
naturally than how they have been trained. Even Maxim Vengerov, a great violinist
trained in the Russian school, went to Trevor Pinnock to play Bach sonatas
with him; they played those at the Barbican. Vengerov went to Rachel Podger to
take some classes with her. People are much more open-minded now than
they used to be. There is much change. The way I see it, there are two things
happening: one is that the Baroque model is becoming a more generic thing
- anyone can do it, as it were - and, on the other hand, the real specialists
are getting deeper and deeper into the minutia of the difference between Paris
of 1690 and Rome in 1690 and how you play Corelli as opposed to Lully, as
opposed to Biber and to Purcell and what the real nuances and differences in
style are between them. The historically informed performance movement was
pioneered and developed by Gustav Leonhardt, Frans Brüggen, the Kuijken
brothers and others. I fear this knowledge is a little in danger of disappearing
because style research is moving forward, with orchestras and individuals
playing later and later repertoire in historically informed styles. So,
the scope of historically informed style has grown from being only focused on
the 17th- and 18th centuries to now addressing most of the 19th century and
even the beginning of the 20th century; a lot of research is being done into
19th century performance practice. In addition to how one should play not only
Haydn, Mozart, Biber and Bach, there is also new focus on informed performance
of works of Schumann, Brahms and Mendelssohn, etc. More and more works are
being dug up. That, in my opinion, is the next step for this movement. But, by
having to know so much about how to play Monteverdi and also how to play Brahms
in a historically informed style, there is only so much specialism you can
have, with the danger of this becoming more generic than it used to be.
PH: How much solo-playing do you do?
KD:
I recently recorded a CD of Bach violin concertos with John Eliot Gardiner and
the English Baroque Soloists; it came out a few months ago. I recorded the
well-known Bach violin concertos and I also arranged two of Bach’s harpsichord
concertos for violin. I do quite a lot of solo-playing and directing with the
Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment: the four leaders get to do their own
projects. I have been doing that for years. There is a Vivaldi “Four Seasons”
CD I recorded with the Age of Enlightenment Then I do quite a lot of work with
groups that invite me to come in to direct them, from the Jerusalem
Baroque Orchestra onwards (and I do go back there.) I collaborate a lot with
Barokkanerne, an orchestra in Norway, with which I have recorded a Telemann CD.
Telemann wrote many violin concertos, excellent works which really should be
performed more often than they are. That was a lovely project. Then there is
Victoria Baroque, an orchestra on the west coast of Canada, with which I
collaborate a lot. I frequently do Brandenburg Concertos with the Italian group
Zefiro (Alfredo Bernardini) So, over the last ten, fifteen years, there
has been a lot of solo work. It’s nice to have that autonomy...having your own
‘voice’, as it were, makes a lovely change from playing in an orchestra, where
your duty is to do execute someone else’s ideas to the best of your ability.
PH:
I am interested to hear more about your transcription of the Bach harpsichord
concerto.
KD: I transcribed the E major concerto (BWV 1053) into
D major for the violin, taking inspiration also from two cantatas where all
three movements appear with the organ as soloist. I wrote it out in the nice,
old-fashioned way, using pencil and paper, and a colleague of mine from the
English Baroque Soloists who has a music publishing company called ‘Fountayne Editions’
arranged it on the computer. It will soon be available to the public, for
anyone who wants to try it. If you fancy another Bach violin concerto and not
just the A minor and E major, here is another possibility.
PH:
How much chamber music do you play?
KD:
At the moment I play in a Classical piano trio - Trio Goya - with fortepianist
Maggie Cole and ‘cellist Sebastian Comberti. We have recorded two CDs - a Haydn
recording and Beethoven’s Opus 1 Trios. I used to work with two other ensembles
- one was Ricordo - we did a lot of 17th century music - the other is
Florilegium, in which I played for six or seven years. I left both due to time
constraints. There are only 24 hours in a day!
PH: What instruments do you own?
KD: I have an Italian violin from Naples from
around 1760, which is a little late, but not too late and it’s in Baroque
condition (although it should be a high Baroque/ Classical set-up.) There is a
possibility that it is by the Gagliarno family of violin makers, but nobody is
prepared to confirm that. So, it is just a lovely Italian instrument. And I
play another 18th century violin, which is in modern condition. Again, nobody
knows where it is from. Experts can’t even agree on whether it is German or
Flemish. It belonged to my teacher, Ora Shiran. It’s the instrument on which she
played with the Israel Chamber Orchestra and it means a lot to me to be able to
own it after her untimely death. It is now strung with gut strings and is
used for playing 19th century repertoire. Well, I still have my lovely first
Baroque violin, which I bought from Myrna, built about 1730 by Leonhardus Maussiell,
a well-known violin maker in Nurnberg. And, of course, I have lots of different
bows for different types of music.
PH:
Do you write about music?
KD:
No. It’s not because I don’t like writing about music. It’s because my métier
is to play music and I leave the writing about it to the people who know how to
do that.
PH:
Do you ever play the modern violin and do you play contemporary music?
KD:
I haven’t played on steel strings for a long time. As mentioned earlier, I play
on a modern violin strung with gut strings; the last repertoire I performed on
it was music by Ibert and Saint-Saëns’ “Carnival of the Animals” and things
like that, in a chamber concert with the Age of Enlightenment. And, before the
coronavirus lockdown, we were due to perform Schoenberg's Chamber Symphony No.
1 in E major, Op. 9, a chamber arrangement of Mahler’s “Das Lied von der Erde”
[The Song of the Earth], a chamber arrangement of Wagner’s Meistersinger
Overture and an opera overture by Hans Pfitzner. It was a wonderful program,
built around the idea of Dr. Faustus, of selling your soul to the devil. I
spent a month “furiously” practising the Schoenberg…Schoenberg on gut strings,
mind you, because that is how it would have been done in Vienna in 1915.
It was written with Arnold Rosé in mind. He was leader of the Rosé Quartet (and
leader of the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, which he was asked to leave in
1938) and would have played the first violin in the Schoenberg. He was also the
violinist who played all the solos in the premieres of all Mahler’s symphonies.
Arnold Rosé’s daughter, Alma Rosé, perished in Auschwitz. She was the
leader of the Women’s Orchestra in the women’s camp. Arnold Rosé survived the
war and went to live in England; he played on gut strings to the end of his
life! So, in the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment, we now play works up to
those of Schoenberg on modern instruments but still with pure gut strings. But
I have not played really contemporary music for a long time.
PH:
Would you like to talk about your teaching?
KD:
I like my teaching very much. I teach at the Royal Conservatory in The
Hague. What I do often see are students wanting teachers to tell them what to
do. I didn’t have that...I had to find it out by myself which, in my opinion,
is not a bad thing. Since we have been in lockdown, I have been teaching
online. To do that, you have to develop new methods of listening and giving
feedback, because you are not in the same room as the student...interesting in
itself. This is no substitute for one-on-one contact, but some on-line teaching
works very well. One nice thing I have had time to do is to have some group
lessons with the students and also the opportunity to ask them to do the proper
reading and research every Baroque violinist should do - reading Quantz,
Leopold Mozart, etc., - to know how to play different dance movements in the
different styles, etc. The students are normally too busy to do these important
things. The students hail from many countries: The Hague is a very
international town, attracting people from all over, and that is very nice.
What is also nice is how supportive the students are of each other; they
develop a network of friends that keeps them in very good stead for the rest of
their professional lives. Their studies there are very formative. I still hear
of former students meeting to play together in different countries. Music is a
global occupation: it has no borders, no nationalities, no religion. We are all
there with the same aim and we interact in a non-verbal language. That is
really a wonderful thing and I feel lucky and privileged to be involved in
that. I have been teaching in The Hague for, I think, 16 years and a lot of my
former students now play all over the world. Some have been doing well in
Australia, one has been playing in Les Arts Florissants, one is playing in the
English Baroque Soloists, some play in various ensembles in Belgium and Holland
and several of them have formed their own chamber groups.
PH:
Is English your language of instruction at The Hague Conservatory?
KD:
Yes and no. I have had two Israeli students whom I taught in Hebrew, two
Hungarian students I teach in Hungarian and I have many students I teach in
Spanish.
PH: Apart from
teaching online, what have been your activities during the coronavirus
lockdown?
KD: Well, over the
last few weeks, we have met lots of neighbours we haven’t met over the last ten
years. That happened because my 10-year-old daughter and I did a little
end-of-the-garden concert. The neighbours sat out with drinks in their
respective gardens and listened. My daughter plays recorder and ‘cello. We
played some evergreens, like “Land of Hope and Glory”, so the neighbours could
sing along, but we also played a little Bach and a little Vivaldi. It was so
successful that we were asked to repeat it, this time in the front garden,
again meeting more people we had previously not known. Then there was VE Day (celebrating the formal acceptance by the Allies of
World War II of Nazi Germany’s unconditional surrender of its armed forces 75
years ago). There was a street party and we organized the entertainment,
with lots of songs from the ‘40s played on recorder and violin, with the
15-year-old flautist from across the road….and all this with social distancing!
Those are lovely things that have come out of this horrible situation.
PH:
When it is not music, what interests you?
KD:
Reading (sometimes reading poetry), enjoying walks in some kind of natural
setting - it can be in a park...it doesn’t need to be the wilderness, but it
should be an environment that has birdsong and the wind. Spending time with the
family; that’s the most important! thing, actually. At the moment, it means
throwing the frisbee with the little one.